Latest News: 25 Million Dollar Wrongful Death Truck Verdict

BLOG TAG: General Motors

News & Commentary

GM Pushing Radical Robot Car Bill Through Florida Legislature

GM Pushing Radical Robot Car Bill Through Florida Legislature

Florida is already out on the safety ledge with respect to self-driving car laws, and a new bill being advanced by General Motors will push us even further over the brink.

Last year, Florida became the first state in the nation to make it legal for a self-driving car to operate without a human being physically present in the vehicle. Critically, however, current Florida law does require that self-driving cars have a human “operator,” who in turn must have a valid driver’s license. Significantly, the licensed “operator” required under current law may be held legally accountable for a crash.

This year GM is pushing a bill, SB 1066 sponsored by Senator Jeff Brandes, that would eliminate the licensed human operator requirement, and would instead deem the “autonomous technology” to be the operator. In other words, if GM’s Bill is passed, a first grader could get into a self-driving car, engage the vehicle’s “autonomous mode”—a term that is not defined in the Bill or elsewhere in Florida law—and then legally cruise down Florida’s roadways.

This Bill is fundamentally flawed and, if enacted, would be horrible for Floridians and the millions of tourists and other motorists who use our state’s roadways. First and foremost, the technology is simply not ready for open testing on public roads. Even companies like Tesla, which has been at the forefront of implementing autonomous features in consumer cars, instruct owners that their vehicles must be constantly monitored while operating with autopilot or similar autonomous features engaged. In fact, the latest model Tesla P100D, which is currently the only production vehicle with full autonomous hardware, requires the driver to hold the steering wheel during operation. If the driver takes his or her hands off the wheel, the vehicle will chime and require that the driver grab the wheel again.

Additionally, GM’s proposed legislation may leave many of those injured by robot cars without any recourse at all. As presently drafted, the effect of the GM Bill will be to shift legal fault away from human drivers and onto the vehicle manufacturer. This approach is inherently flawed because it overlooks the reality that foreign companies from nations like China, which generally does not recognize the jurisdiction of U.S. courts and has consistently refused to enforce U.S. judgments, will be heavily involved in the self-driving car marketplace.

Indeed, one of the major players in this arena is Faraday Future, which is owned by LeEco, a Chinese technology company. In addition to the jurisdictional concerns that exist for all foreign corporations, recent reports suggest that the company may be having money issues, creating yet another potential barrier to recovery for injured consumers. Under GM’s Bill, Chinese companies like Faraday Future will be able to beta test their self-driving cars on Florida roads with no licensed driver to monitor or be accountable for the vehicles’ operation. If one of those vehicles were to crash into a Floridian and cause him or her to suffer severe injuries, that individual and his or her family may very well be left without any avenue for recourse.

Even GM’s home state of Michigan has more stringent requirements that serve to protect the interests of that state’s motorists. Unlike GM’s Florida Bill, current Michigan law requires an automaker to post a $10 Million bond, or provide proof of equivalent insurance coverage, before the company’s robot cars can be operated on Michigan roadways. Floridians deserve the same level of protection as that in place for the citizens of GM’s home state.

So why is this radical robot car Bill flying through the legislature? Why has the Bill already passed through one House committee without any amendments? The obvious answer can be found here, on the Florida House of Representative’s website that shows how many lobbyists have registered for a particular bill. At last count, at least 10 lobbyists have filed appearances on this legislation.

This Bill is not about good public policy. It’s unquestionably bad policy, and will make Florida laws for robot cars an even further outlier from all other 49 states. Hopefully before this Bill moves further it can be amended to provide some basic protections for all the innocent drivers who are at risk from robot cars that are still in beta testing by not only American companies like GM, but also by foreign companies such as the Chinese-owned Faraday Future.

Meanwhile, check out this YouTube video which shows a Tesla driver asleep at the wheel while “driving” down the highway with the vehicle’s autopilot feature engaged.

 

GM Ignition Switch MDL Gears Up for 2015

GM Ignition Switch MDL Gears Up for 2015

On March 10, 2010, Brooke Melton was driving her 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt in Paulding County, Ga., when the car’s engine suddenly shut off. Melton lost control of the vehicle, which veered into oncoming traffic and collided with another car. The crash killed Melton on her 29th birthday.

Read more

General Motors Issues Recall for More than 290,000 Chevrolet Cruzes

General Motors Issues Recall for More than 290,000 Chevrolet Cruzes

Relatively inexpensive and compact, the Chevrolet Cruze is meant to be the perfect starter vehicle for young consumers. Unfortunately for those consumers, the Cruze has experienced its fair share of problems. In 2012, General Motors recalled approximately 413,418 Chevrolet Cruzes from the 2011 and 2012 model years due to engine shields that could have caused liquids to become trapped in the engine compartment, posing a fire hazard.

Read more

NHTSA Investigates GM Recall Issued in May

NHTSA Investigates GM Recall Issued in May

In early May of this year, General Motors recalled about 42,000 vehicles due to a battery control fire hazard. The recalled vehicles, which include the 2012 and 2013 Buick LaCrosse and Regal and 2013 Chevrolet Malibu models, reportedly had a defective Generator Control Module that could cause a slow loss of battery charge and an illuminated malfunction indicator light.

Read more

GM Recalls Approximately 27,000 Cadillac SRXs Due to Loose Wheel Nuts

GM Recalls Approximately 27,000 Cadillac SRXs Due to Loose Wheel Nuts

In early May, GM announced the development of a supercomputer data storage center and in-house software that will help the company spot problems before they develop into massive recalls. Ultimately, GM plans to construct two state-of-the-art IT facilities which the company believes will help create computer simulated crash tests to improve safety and investigate problems. Although these two “innovation centers” won’t be complete until 2015, the company

Read more

General Motors Recalls Over 42,000 Vehicles Due To Battery Control Fire Hazard

General Motors Recalls Over 42,000 Vehicles Due To Battery Control Fire Hazard

Last year, General Motors issued a massive recall of every Chevrolet Cruze sedan that was sold in the United States because of a fire risk.  The defective engine shield could trap highly flammable liquids such as hydraulic fluids or engine fluids, potentially resulting in a fire.  Approximately 53,000 vehicles from the 2011 and 2012 model years included in the recall may additionally have a loose fuel tank strap that could leak and pose another fire hazard.

Read more

GM Announces Recall Of More Than 36,000 Vehicles

GM Announces Recall Of More Than 36,000 Vehicles

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has announced that General Motors will begin a voluntary recall of more than 36,000 Chevrolet Impala police cruisers in the United States on August 21. An additional 1,700 vehicles are also included in Canada. The reason for the recall is a defect in the vehicle manufacturing that allows for a fracture in the lower front control arms.

Read more
x
OVER $500,000,000 recovered
Newsome Melton has recovered over half a billion dollars for their clients.
Product Liability Lawyer - Newsome Melton

Please do not navigate away from this page until you receive a success notification.
Product Liability Lawyer - Newsome Melton