Latest News: 25 Million Dollar Wrongful Death Truck Verdict

BLOG TAG: Supreme Court

News & Commentary

BREAKING NEWS: Florida Supreme Court Rules Med Mal Caps Unconstitutional

BREAKING NEWS: Florida Supreme Court Rules Med Mal Caps Unconstitutional

Yesterday, the Florida Supreme Court issued a landmark decision, North Broward Hospital District v. Kalitan, which effectively abolishes the arbitrary caps on medical malpractice damages the Legislature enacted back in 2003. Historically, Floridians injured by medical negligence were stuck with incredibly limited awards for non-economic damages, thanks to the efforts and lobbying prowess of various tort “reformers” in the early 2000s.  The Kalitan decision restores the rights of injured Floridians, enabling them to obtain the full measure of their damages as assessed by a jury of their peers.  This decision is a monumental victory for consumers and the civil justice system in the ongoing battle with the powerful corporate interests that continue to exert their wealth and influence to erode everyday citizens’ constitutional right to the access of courts.

The case arose from a tragic set of circumstances.  Susan Kalitan underwent outpatient carpal tunnel surgery, and during intubation, one of the tubes perforated her esophagus.  Her medical providers, apparently unaware that her esophagus was perforated, discharged her that same day.  The next day, her neighbor checked on her, and found her unresponsive.  She was then placed under a drug-induced coma, and upon waking, underwent several additional surgeries and “intensive therapy to begin eating again and regain mobility.”  Kalitan, SC15-1858, at 3.  The evidence reflected that “she continues to suffer from pain throughout the upper half of her body and from serious mental disorders as a result of the traumatic incident and the loss of independence because of her body’s physical limitations following this incident.”  Id.

The jury, after reviewing the evidence, determined that she had suffered from a catastrophic, “severe brain or closed-head injury,” and awarded her $4,718,011 in total damages—including $2,000,000 for past pain and suffering and $2,000,000 for future pain and suffering.  Id. at 4. Then, the trial judge wiped most of that award away, citing to the caps on non-economic damages contained in Section 766.118, Florida Statutes.

The Fourth District Court of Appeal subsequently overruled the trial court’s order reducing the Plaintiff’s award.  In doing so, the 4th DCA pointed to a critical change in the law—namely, the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Estate of McCall v. United States.  That case, which was brought by a family who contended that their loved one died as the result of medical negligence, had resulted in the partial overturn of Section 766.118 back in 2014.  Specifically, the McCall plurality and concurring opinions ruled that “there was no evidence of a continuing medical malpractice crisis that would justify the arbitrary application of the statutory cap in wrongful death cases.”  Id. at 12.

Kalitan is the logical extension of McCall.  Just as there was no evidence of a crisis to support the arbitrary caps on wrongful death damages, there is likewise no evidence to support arbitrary caps on personal injury damages in medical malpractice cases.  As explained by the Court, the caps failed to meet the rational basis test because, “[i]n the context of persons catastrophically injured by medical negligence . . . it is unreasonable and arbitrary to limit their recovery in a speculative experiment to determine whether liability insurance rates will decrease.”  Id. at 18 (emphasis in original).

The Kalitan decision is correct on the law and represents great public policy.  Thanks to this well-reasoned opinion, Floridians who suffer needless injury because of medical negligence will be able to obtain the compensation they need to put their lives back together.  And, hopefully, this decision will pave the way for future challenges to other statutory tort “reforms” dreamed up by powerful corporate interests.

BREAKING NEWS: Florida Supreme Court Rejects Daubert, Medical Malpractice Expert Witness Rules to the Extent They are Procedural

BREAKING NEWS: Florida Supreme Court Rejects Daubert, Medical Malpractice Expert Witness Rules to the Extent They are Procedural

BREAKING NEWS: The Florida Supreme Court Rejects Daubert and Medical Malpractice Expert Witness Rules to the Extent They are Procedural Yesterday, the Florida Supreme Court rejected both the Daubert standard and the medical malpractice same specialty requirement “to the extent” each one “is procedural.”  This ruling is a major victory for consumers. Back in 2013, […]

Read more

Florida Supreme Court Authorizes Punitive Damages in Tobacco Litigation

Florida Supreme Court Authorizes Punitive Damages in Tobacco Litigation

Yesterday the Florida Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in the case of Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, opening the door for juries to award punitive damages in Engle tobacco cases in courts throughout the state.  This holding will have a huge and immediate impact in state court Engle cases as well as other […]

Read more

SCOTUS Slams the Courthouse Doors on Another Consumer Class Action in Latest Arbitration Decision

SCOTUS Slams the Courthouse Doors on Another Consumer Class Action in Latest Arbitration Decision

Mandatory arbitration provisions, contractual clauses which prevent consumers from exercising their right to a jury trial or pursuing claims on a class basis, have become an unavoidable trap over the last several years.  Powerful corporations bury these provisions in their form adhesion contracts, which consumers must agree to in order to obtain most of the […]

Read more

Strict Products Liability Restored: The Florida Supreme Court Definitively Rules that the Second Restatement is Still the Law in Florida

Strict Products Liability Restored: The Florida Supreme Court Definitively Rules that the Second Restatement is Still the Law in Florida

Strict Products Liability Restored: The Florida Supreme Court Definitively Rules that the Second Restatement is Still the Law in Florida Will Ourand Newsome Melton, P.A. Florida consumers won a major victory when the Florida Supreme Court adopted the Second Restatement’s doctrine of strict products liability in 1976.  This victory was in peril over the last […]

Read more

Several Prominent GOP Leaders Come Forward in Support of Florida Supreme Court Justices

Several Prominent GOP Leaders Come Forward in Support of Florida Supreme Court Justices

Former U.S. Attorneys Roberto Martinez and Marcos Jimenez have recently teamed up with former judge and GOP Lt. Gov. candidate Allison DeFoorto oppose an effort in Florida to remove three Florida Supreme Court Justices during this November’s elections. Being targeted are Barbara Pariente, Fred Lewis and Peggy Quince.  While the merit retention vote occurs every six years, this is the first time there has been a serious push to remove sitting justices.

Read more

Anti-Consumer Bill Will Protect Auto Makers In Defective Car Cases

Anti-Consumer Bill Will Protect Auto Makers In Defective Car Cases

This coming Tuesday afternoon, the Florida Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Senator Anitere Flores will take up an anti-consumer bill involving automobile safety. This bill is being spearheaded by Ford Motor Company and if passed, will have huge consequences for consumers who are maimed and killed by defective cars.

Read more
x
OVER $500,000,000 recovered
Newsome Melton has recovered over half a billion dollars for their clients.
Product Liability Lawyer - Newsome Melton

Please do not navigate away from this page until you receive a success notification.
Product Liability Lawyer - Newsome Melton